Friday, May 19. 2006
Apparently the house that Rick Santorum owns in Penn Hills, PA is now vacant (it was previously rented out to family members). However, you shouldn't try to confirm that yourself because the police have stepped up patrols in the area of the house based on reports of trespassers. Here's the story from KDKA-TV
He doesn't live here, said Ed Vecchio of Penn Hills. The house he's registered to vote out of, is vacant -- no curtains, furniture, nothing in there. It's abandoned for over a month. So, I feel it's my right to contest his vote.
Those comments from the husband of the head of the Penn Hills Democratic Party led police to beef up patrols around the home of U.S. Senator Rick Santorum. The increased police presence began late Tuesday, after authorities in Washington D.C. contacted Penn Hills authorities. U.S. Capitol Police received a complaint from Karen Santorum.
She was worried that someone was trespassing or prowling on their Penn Hills property.
Thursday, May 11. 2006
Our new web ad illustrates yet another example of Rick Santorum's stunning hypocrisy. Back in 1992 Rick starred in his own commercial and chastised Congressional leaders for running up massive deficits and passing the bill along to our children. Rick said back then that he would, "continue my fight to clean up Congress and its greedy spending practices." Sadly (but not surprisingly), ending "the greedy spending practices" of Congress wasn't the focus of any Santorum battles. Instead, he fought his way into the Senate leadership, and he's led us to budget deficits of more than $1.25 TRILLION. Watch the ad to see Rick say one thing and do the exact opposite. Don't forget to share the ad with your friends, family members and contacts.
 Click the image to watch the ad
Wednesday, May 10. 2006
Last night on MSNBC's Countdown, Keith Olbermann reported on Rick Santorum's hypocrisy in regard to subsidized trips on corporate jets. A story originally reported in the Philadelphia Inquirer. Keith's face at the end of this clip perfectly sums up our reaction to Rick's justification of his behavior based upon his logically flawed comparison to the gas tax. Here's the video:  Click image to watch video
Thursday, May 4. 2006
Yesterday's Philadelphia Inquirer lays out yet another case of Rick Santorum's hypocrisy. While Rick was publicly pushing to add a provision to ethics reform legislation that would end corporate-subsidized flights for members of Congress, he was taking advantage of those very same corporate-subzidized flights to travel to fund raisers.
Speaking from the Senate floor, U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum (R., Pa.) urged his colleagues to curtail a popular perk: private corporate-sponsored flights at bargain rates for members of Congress.
"This is clearly a subsidy," he said March 8.
Two days earlier, he had taken a BellSouth plane from a runway near his home in Leesburg, Va., to fund-raising events in North Carolina and South Carolina. The jet ferried Santorum, two aides and Ward White, BellSouth's top Washington lobbyist.
Santorum paid $6,955 - first-class rates, as Senate rules require, but a fraction of what it costs to operate the plane.
Not surprisingly, the corporate travel provision he was pushing while he was the "point man" on ethics reform was not included in the final package.
Tuesday, May 2. 2006
Jon Delano, from KDKA-TV in Pittsburgh, asked Rick Santorum whether he's on the side of oil companies who are reaping huge profits, or the consumers who are now paying $3 a gallon for gas. Delano's question was based on the fact that oil companies have been very generous to Rick, giving him more than $400,000 over his Congressional career. Delano didn't bring up the fact that Rick voted to give more than $2 billion in tax breaks to oil and gas companies in last summer's energy bill. Watch the Delano video here. Here's Rick's answer:
I don't think I'm on the side of the oil companies, replied Santorum. I'm on the side of trying to create energy independence for America.I'm on the side of trying to produce more energy in this country, to create the jobs here instead of in Venezuela or Iraq or Iran. We have the ability in this country to produce more energy.
And he says it's no surprise that 80 percent of big oil's political contributions go to Republicans.
It's only logical that they're going to support people who support the agenda of energy independence for America, said Santorum.
It's also only logical that oil and gas companies would support people who vote to give them giant tax breaks while they're making record profits, right Rick? Whose side do you think Rick's on?
Tuesday, April 25. 2006
Rick Santorum recently addressed students at North Catholic High School in Pittsburgh and said something that we found very interesting. Rick was telling the students that when he was growing up he didn't live close enough to a Catholic high school to attend one. But that's not what we found interesting, what was interesting was when Rick said this, "So, I didn't go to a Catholic high school when I was living in Pennsylvania." (emphasis ours) We find it refreshing that Rick has decided to drop all pretense and acknowledge that he doesn't live in the state he represents. Here's the video:  Click image to play video
Monday, April 24. 2006
The Beaver County Times tells us about Lloyd "Skip" Haswell, a Marine Corps veteran who was recently listed as a member of a group of "Veterans for Santorum." It seems that Rick's recent vote against an amendment to provide "an assured stream of funding for veterans health care," and his failure to respond to Mr. Haswell's inquiries about that vote, have caused Mr. Haswell to reconsider his support for Rick:
Haswell is also president of Beaver County's Vietnam Veterans of America Chapter 862 and a district director for the Vietnam Veterans of America. However, on March 16, Santorum voted against an amendment to a budget bill that would have provided steady funding for veterans health care, a move that did not sit well with Haswell. According to a description on the U.S. Senate's Web site, the amendment - introduced by U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., and U.S. Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D. - would have provided "an assured stream of funding for veterans health care that will take into account the annual changes in the veterans population and inflation to be paid for by restoring the pre-2001 top rate for income over $1 million, closing corporate tax loopholes and delaying tax cuts for the wealthy." U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Philadelphia, voted yes, but the amendment was defeated 54 to 46. It's probably a good guess that Santorum, a President Bush loyalist, had some issues with closing "tax loopholes" and "delaying tax cuts for the wealthy." Haswell said he's been trying to get an answer from Santorum's people on why the senator rejected the amendment, but his calls have been ignored. Consequently, he pulled out of the Veterans for Santorum, saying he can't campaign for someone who "votes against veterans" then can't take the time to explain himself. "The veterans deserve answers," Haswell said," and that's all I'm asking for."
We agree with Mr. Haswell, veterans do deserve answers from Rick Santorum to questions like this one: why do you vote to continue tax cuts for the rich at the expense of health care funding for veterans?Please call Rick's office or send him an email and see if he'll answer your questions.
Here's Rick's number: 202-224-6324 Click here to email Rick.
Let us know in the comments if you get any answers.
Friday, April 21. 2006
Rick Santorum has received yet another distinction. A Survey USA poll released yesterday puts Rick's job approval rating at 39% and his disapproval rating at 53%. This poll makes it official, Rick Santorum is now the least popular member of the U.S. Senate. Congratulations, Rick.
Tuesday, April 18. 2006
In the latest episode of HBO's The Sopranos, Tony Soprano discusses his feelings about homosexuality with his psychiatrist. During the discussion we learn that Tony agrees "with that Senator Sanatorium" when it comes to what societal acceptance of homosexuality might lead to. Here's the video:  Click image to watch video
Monday, April 3. 2006
We're now exposing Rick Santorum on TV. Watch our ads and then help us keep them running by making a contribution today.
Saturday, April 1. 2006
Rick Santorum spoke to the conservative Pennsylvania Leadership Conference last night. During his address he spoke about faith in the United States and compared it to the role of faith in western Europe. Here's what Rick claims is happening to western Europe because of secularism, "Those cultures are dying. People are dying. They're being overrun from overseas... and they have no response. They have nothing to fight for. They have nothing to live for." On the other hand according to Rick, "More people go to church on Sunday in America than go to all of the sporting events in America held in a year combined." We're not sure where that statistic comes from or what it means, but Rick seems to find it reassuring. Here's the video:  Click image to play video
Friday, March 31. 2006
Earlier this week Rick Santorum said the ethics reform bill that passed the Senate was "a much tougher bill than I think anyone could have anticipated when we started this process." The Philadelphia Inquirer's Editorial Board seems to disagree:
It's official: The Senate believes it can fool all of the people all of the time.
Senators on Wednesday approved, 90-8, an ethics bill that should fool nobody. It's a watered-down, toothless attempt to address the recent lobbying scandals that resulted in one ex-congressman being hauled off to prison for taking bribes, and a Justice Department probe into the influence peddling of former lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Wednesday, March 29. 2006
Rick Santorum, the self-proclaimed Republican point man on ethics reform, voted yesterday to kill a proposed independent ethics office. Apparently he doesn't want outsiders policing Senators.
Mr. Santorum said that when outside groups have filed ethics complaints against him with the Senate ethics panel, "they're looked at seriously, we have to respond to them, and in some cases we've had to hire counsel to deal with them."
But Mr. Santorum said he opposed the independent office because "to hire somebody who is a hired gun from the outside -- whose job it is to sort of 'get' senators -- I just think is corruption of the process."
It's too bad the Republicans chose Rick for their point man. While Rick was preparing to vote against the independent office, Sen. John McCain proved that he understood why it would be an important addition to an ethics reform package.
"We need to restore the confidence of the American ... people in the way we do business," said Mr. McCain, as he advocated for the independent office before the vote yesterday. "Our approval ratings are down around 25 percent, 26 percent, and there are people who continue to be deeply disturbed about the way ... we do business.... Shouldn't we do what we can to help fix either a real or imagined problem?"
Why Doesn't Rick get that?
Tuesday, March 28. 2006
Rick Santorum was on Imus in the Morning today and he discussed his charity with Don. Santorum said that other than helping to raise money and hand out checks for the charity, which he created and serves as honorary chairman of the board for, he doesn't have a large role in it. He claims he doesn't decide who gets money from the charity and he doesn't really know many of the charity's donors. At the end of the interview Imus suggested that Rick should find out more information about the charity. Do you believe that the founder and chairman of what Rick characterizes as a "small, little non-profit" wouldn't know its donors? And what exactly has happened to Rick's belief in personal responsibility? Why is he comfortable being the public face of Operation Good Neighbor on its web site and for the purposes of handing out money, but unwilling to take responsibility for or even acknowledge the charity's questionable practices? Here's background info on Santorum's charity problems. Here's the video: Click image to play video
Continue reading "Santorum Passes the Buck"
Wednesday, March 22. 2006
In an editorial titled " Lobbyist Reform as a Shell Game," the New York Times skewers Rick Santorum and his role in the current effort to reform Congressional ethics rules. Here's an excerpt:
Enter Capitol reality: As Congress drifts through a lobbying debate that leans toward cosmetic evasions, Mr. Santorum has been as avid as ever in wooing power lobbyists. The Washington Post reported that the senator had maintained his elite meetings with special-interest brokers.
The senator exemplifies the ultimate scandal in the reform debate: that the subversive money nexus between lawmakers' campaigns and opportunistic lobbyists is not even on the agenda. An honest run at the problem would stop lobbyists from bundling together maximum campaign donations from their clients. Many lawmakers have dropped any arm's length pretense and enlisted big-time lobbyists as formal treasurers for their political kitties.
|