Santorum Exposed: The Blog Comments

hjehoitc: Rick's New Gig

nospam@example.com (hjehoitc) — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:15:45 -0700

vlzjktcj http://wjdutxws.com olmrxmfp dimskznt

Salliter: Rick's New Gig

nospam@example.com (Salliter) — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:59:31 -0700

adipex http://adipex-hb4356d.blogspot.com/
Ciao!

Salliter: Rick's New Gig

nospam@example.com (Salliter) — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:10:04 -0700

ephedra http://ephedra-moza.blogspot.com/
See you.

isaterfera: Rick's New Gig

nospam@example.com (isaterfera) — Wed, 10 Jan 2007 05:49:11 -0700

http://isater.com/news/categ-canadian_county_department_health-3327.html - canadian county department health
canadian county department health

Gordon: Santorum helps release nuclear secrets

nospam@example.com (Gordon) — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:20:10 -0700

I believe this document refers to documents released in 1999 - that would have been under Bill Clinton's watch - yes?

FAS | Government Secrecy | January 2000 News ||| Index | Search | Join FAS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reuters
January 19, 2000

U.S. finds nuclear secrets in open archives
WASHINGTON, Jan 19 (Reuters) - Hundreds of declassified U.S. government documents at the National Archives, available for public perusal, contained nuclear weapons secrets that mistakenly had been left in, an Energy Department review made public on Wednesday said.
The Energy Department, due to a 1998 law, is reviewing already declassified documents to ensure that nuclear secrets were not inadvertently left in, and issued its first report to Congress shortly before Christmas, an official said.

Energy officials said the declassified documents embedded with nuclear secrets were from U.S. agencies other than the Energy Department, but declined to name them.

The issue of U.S. nuclear secrets has been a hot-button item for Congress since accusations erupted publicly last year that China allegedly obtained information on U.S. nuclear weapons through espionage, a charge that Beijing denies.

Under President Bill Clinton's order, U.S. government documents older than 25 years must be reviewed for declassification.

The Federation of American Scientists, a nonprofit group focused on national security issues, posted an unclassified executive summary of the report on its Web site www.fas.org.

"This is stuff that represents information about old weapons, old tests," an Energy Department official familiar with the whole report told Reuters.

Classified information was left in the documents largely due to human error in which reviewers missed markings that showed the information was restricted, the official said.

"These things are of concern because they could be valuable to someone who was trying to develop a nuclear capability," the official said on condition of anonymity.

"I'm not saying that we've discovered anything that gives away the farm ... but there are bits and pieces of information that we've pulled off the shelves that are classified and should not have been there," the official added.

ONE CASE OF "COMPROMISE"

Of 948,000 pages audited by the Energy Department, 14,890 pages included restricted information that should not have been declassified, the report to Congress said.

"I recognize the gravity of these inadvertent releases," Energy Secretary Bill Richardson said in a letter to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner dated Nov. 29, 1999.

Energy Department staff prevented the inadvertent release of nuclear secrets in about 2,250 documents that were in the process of being issued publicly, Richardson said.

There was only one case in which there was "compelling evidence" that classified information was used by a researcher, the report said. That information related to the deployment of nuclear weapons in a foreign country in the early 1950s, rather than nuclear design or production information.

The executive summary of the report said the restricted material inadvertently released included:

-- documents on "nuclear tests that provide insight into the level of weapon design technology in the late 1950s and early 1960s" and nuclear weapon systems that were either retired or never reached production and stockpiling.
-- documents revealing U.S. "nuclear weapon design information from the test results of a specified nuclear test program."

-- documents that provided U.S. nuclear test results of a specified nuclear test, the military and technical basis for atmospheric testing during a specified year, and a specified nuclear device with the specified date of the underground test.

-- documents covering nuclear weapons utilization information such as yields of specific weapons and deployment and storage locations.

-- documents covering nuclear weapons design information for increasing yields and nuclear weapon utilization information such as yields of specified weapons and deployment and storage locations.

The release of such information is of concern because it could benefit U.S. adversaries and "terrorist groups" as older nuclear weapons are easier to construct than current weapons, the report said.
"Nuclear weapons, it's the laws of physics that apply, and a weapon that worked well with a World War Two design would still function today. So there are still parts of the weapons that we dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki that are classified," the Energy official said.

Copyright © 2000 Reuters Limited.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAS | Government Secrecy | January 2000 News ||| Index | Search | Join FAS

Z: Your taxes at work for Rick

nospam@example.com (Z) — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:23:01 -0700

I received the same email immediately AFTER the election when I wrote to him regarding the Combatting Autism bill. They weren't on recess then.

Dylan McArthur: Santorum: Hannity is greatest american

nospam@example.com (Dylan McArthur) — Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:51:41 -0700

Crazy Cat Lady,

Are you still excited about Rick's next six years in office?

Wondering,
Dylan McArthur

Tim H: Santorum the Shooting Star

nospam@example.com (Tim H) — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:42:42 -0700

Santorum should join Frist in *NOT* running for Senate.

Tim H: Your taxes at work for Rick

nospam@example.com (Tim H) — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:41:19 -0700

I have to disagree. He is still entitled to his salary for the rest of his term just like every other member of congress who is on recess. However, it would be nice if he would close some of his offices to help save some money since they aren't doing anything.

FYI: I am a Democrat who voted for Casey.

Polt: Santorum the Shooting Star

nospam@example.com (Polt) — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:55:26 -0700

The Santorum/Lincoln comparison is interesting, butcha gotta remember, Rick Santorum is NO Abe Lincoln. Its an insult, actually, to compare the two.

Ricky can now just retire somewhere, pay for his kids education himself, instead of the PA taxpayers, collect his Congressional retirement, and ponder what might have been, had he NOT been so far to the right, and less divisive.

Scott: Ask Not What Santorum Can Do For You

nospam@example.com (Scott) — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:18:53 -0700

Thank you for th insite. I am looking for true republican to support in 08. With the information that you have provided, it is clear if Santorum runs, I should support him.

It is clear that he will be a true conservative. Not a Dem calling himself a conservative

Thanks Again

mikealao: Santorum helps release nuclear secrets

nospam@example.com (mikealao) — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:46:18 -0700

Thank goodness Santorum lost. What a jerk!

http://mikealao.blogspot.com/

Voice of Reason: Santorum: Hannity is greatest american

nospam@example.com (Voice of Reason) — Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:53:50 -0700

WOO HOO... see ya Santorum!

gn: Santorum helps release nuclear secrets

nospam@example.com (gn) — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 13:08:17 -0700

Klick my link for Komic Kommentary on Bush and Keystone Kop Little Ricky and their adventures on the internets.

Tim H: Does Santorum need money?

nospam@example.com (Tim H) — Mon, 06 Nov 2006 09:45:54 -0700

He definitely can make more money as a lobbyist or a consultant once he gets out.